Topic #1 – Is God arrogant? Edward Oleander's first charge against God is that God is arrogant, and for this Ed believes God needs to repent. God is the Creator, and Ed believes that because God has created mankind and places demands on people that they could never meet. Further, Ed claims that though God created the universe, He treats it as a toy and does things despite the heavy toll it takes on human beings. Ed has helped us in understanding what he is trying to say by pointing to two examples where Ed believes God acts in an arrogant way: the killing of the firstborn in Egypt, and Noah's flood which destroyed everyone and everything except those on Noah's ark.
Your question raises the important topic of Theology (the study of God and God's relationship to the world). Who is God and why has He done the things that are reported about Him in the Bible? You have hit on the central reason why there are false charges made against God – it is because of a false understanding of God, and an inadequate understanding of God's Word. If God truly was arrogant, cruel, and selfish, as you described in your Comment, who would want to worship Him?
So here is what I want to do in this post – I want to provide us with a better understanding of how the Bible describes God and His actions, and see if this provides a better explanation of why God chose to kill Egypt's firstborn, and also to see why the flood described in the story of Noah and the Ark was sent. My hope is that we can take a fair look at the Scriptures and agree that God is not arrogant, and instead is better described as loving, long-suffering and just.
- The first issue raised by your charge that God is arrogant is did God really do these things? Your Comment assumed (rightfully so, I think) that God was responsible for the death of Egypt's firstborn as described in the Book of Exodus, and also the Flood during Noah's time. Although for these two events it is clear that God is responsible for what was done, there may be other times (for example, the tragic loss of life during the Holocaust) when there may be a genuine issue of whether God is directly responsible for what was done. I am only raising this issue now (no response is necessary), as it may come up later. But for now, I believe we both agree that God is sovereign (see, Job 37:5-6, Daniel 4:35, with lots of other places in the Bible like Psalm 66:7) and directly caused both the flood and the plague of the death of Egypt's firstborn.
- A major theme of your attacks against God is the death of infants, primarily I assume because infants are innocent. Infants and the young have not made wrong choices, they are not old enough for taking responsibility of their actions, and probably you agree that everyone loves babies and infants, and hates even the thought of their death or suffering.
So let's start with the sending of the 10th plague to Egypt, the taking of the firstborn in Egypt. Although my normal tack is to explain the issue of God's just punishment of Egypt through this example, let me instead try to show you that God showed His love through this loss of life. God's Word says that God is love (1 John 4:8). This does not mean that God is just loving in His actions. Instead, God's nature is love. What God does is always loving.
And so, am I off my rocker in saying that the taking of Egypt's firstborn lives is a loving action? I don't think I am, but I'll leave that up to you. Remember how horrible Egypt was in their treatment of the Jewish slaves they had. Here are a few of the verses describing the brutal way the Egyptians treated their Hebrew slaves:
- Exodus 1:11-14, Egyptian Merciless Treatment of the Jewish Slaves - So the Egyptians made the Israelites their slaves. They appointed brutal slave drivers over them, hoping to wear them down with crushing labor. They forced them to build the cities of Pithom and Rameses as supply centers for the king. 12 But the more the Egyptians oppressed them, the more the Israelites multiplied and spread, and the more alarmed the Egyptians became. 13 So the Egyptians worked the people of Israel without mercy. 14 They made their lives bitter, forcing them to mix mortar and make bricks and do all the work in the fields. They were ruthless in all their demands.
- Exodus 1:15-16, Murder Ordered of the Jewish Baby Boys - Then Pharaoh, the king of Egypt, gave this order to the Hebrew midwives, Shiphrah and Puah: 16 "When you help the Hebrew women as they give birth, watch as they deliver. If the baby is a boy, kill him; if it is a girl, let her live."
- Exodus 5, Israelites Beg Pharaoh for Mercy, Who Inflicts Even Greater Work - So the Israelite foremen went to Pharaoh and pleaded with him. "Please don't treat your servants like this," they begged. 16 "We are given no straw, but the slave drivers still demand, 'Make bricks!' We are being beaten, but it isn't our fault! Your own people are to blame!" 17 But Pharaoh shouted, "You're just lazy! Lazy! That's why you're saying, 'Let us go and offer sacrifices to the Lord.' 18 Now get back to work! No straw will be given to you, but you must still produce the full quota of bricks."
- Exodus 3:7-8a, God Hears the Cries of the People of Israel - Then the Lord told him, "I have certainly seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their cries of distress because of their harsh slave drivers. Yes, I am aware of their suffering. 8 So I have come down to rescue them from the power of the Egyptians and lead them out of Egypt into their own fertile and spacious land.
Thus, the children of Israel were brutally treated by their Egyptian masters, their babies were murdered, and they begged for mercy. And none was given. And so, God sent a Prophet to the Egyptians to let them know that the God of Israel was the true God, and that the Egyptian gods were mere idols. And Israel's God showed His love for the people of Israel by helping them be freed from their slavery. Yes, it is love that is the most important thing revealed by God through this story – His love for the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Therefore, God's love is shown by protecting the people of Israel from brutal treatment, and providing them with their freedom.
- God's Justice. I'm not going to forget about the key aspect in the Exodus story of God's Justice and rightful punishment of oppressors. Remember, Egypt had taken advantage of the Israelites, made them their slaves, and treated them monstrously. God had sent His Prophet Moses to proclaim God's Word to Egypt 'Let My people go'. And Pharaoh and the Egyptians rejected God's call and warning. (See, Exodus 11). But even though 9 prior plagues were sent by God to Egypt, and despite Moses' warning of the final plague, the Pharaoh would not relent and free the children of Israel, God's people. And so, God rightly brought judgment upon Egypt and Pharaoh. But the key here is that God did send a Prophet to warn them. God sent plagues to show His displeasure for the barbaric treatment of the Israelites. And God provided a final warning before He sent the final plague, the death of the first-born, with this warning being rejected. Now not only Egypt, but the entire world now knew that the One true God, was the God of Israel. Further, God from this time on was well known for what He did that night in Egypt. And the Jews continue their remembrance of this night through their celebration of the Passover when God protected Israel and issued rightful Judgment upon Egypt.
The one thing that I don't think that you understand about God which is revealed by your Comment that God is arrogant is that there is Justice in God's Order. People must pay for selfish behavior they commit while on Earth. Can you imagine a world where there are no consequences for what they do? Sometimes, the punishment is meted out in this life. But God also promises there is a punishment after death, where all of one's sins are reviewed by Jesus Himself on Judgment Day (Matthew 25:31-:46). So most importantly, we know that Divine Justice will be given to all for what was done during their life. And there is only one chance: For it is appointed unto man to die once and after this to face Judgment. (Hebrews 9:27).
- This leads me to now discuss your second charge of God's arrogance the flood and God's protection of Noah, his family, and the animals that entered the Ark two-by-two. Again, I want to make sure that you have a better understanding of the context of what was taking place in the world before God sent His flood. Here is what God's Word says about the times that Noah and his family were living in:
- Genesis 6:5-6 - The Lord observed the extent of human wickedness on the earth, and he saw that everything they thought or imagined was consistently and totally evil. 6 So the Lord was sorry he had ever made them and put them on the earth. It broke his heart.
This section of Genesis shows the total depravity of humanity at this time in history. Everything people thought or imagined was evil. It is hard to conceive of what a wholly wicked society would look like, but we have a little glimpse of this through the actions of Nazi Germany in World War II. Millions of people starved, raped, experimented on, and then killed with poisonous gas. Mass graves. People shaved for their hair so the Germans could use it. Tattooed like a brand on cattle. And everything the Jews owned was stolen from them as if they were not even human. And the Germans all followed orders while the monstrous atrocities were taking place around them. And the world during Noah's time was somehow even worse than this.
Yet again we see God's love through even these times. God created people in His image so He could have a relationship with us, and that they could act in a way of community with each other, and have fellowship with God through eternity. Instead, people during the Days of Noah were completely evil – this means that they spent their days consumed with their own malevolent thoughts, hurting each other, and gratifying their selfish desires of lust and greed. It is a good thing God put an end to this. So what is the most loving thing God could do in this sort of world? Let them continue hurting and terrorizing each other. The strong bullying the weak. The weak plotting ways of revenge. A world in flames of evil and wickedness. Isn't starting over and helping the world by establishing a nation that which will ultimately provide the Messiah, God's own example of His love for all of the nations? A nation from where God's own Son will come, to teach, to be an example, and to be a sacrifice for those who will accept it?
- What is God Really Like? The Story of the Prodigal Son, Luke 15.11-32 – I recently accidentally let one of our family's favorite cats Oliver out of the house. Oliver was especially Peggy's favorite cat. And when she learned he was out, she spent days looking for him, notifying all of the Humane Societies in the area of what he looked like. She drove around the area and put up over 100 flyers of our lost cat. We previously have lost two cats who when they ran away from home were run over in the street. And so, Peggy and the kids spent hours each day to try and find this lovable cat, Oliver.
Then we got the word that there was a cat matching the description of Oliver lying dead on a snow bank at County Road 42 and County Road 11 in Burnsville. We looked, Peggy much more than the rest of us, but we couldn't find him. One of Peggy's friends was found diving in a garbage dumpster by the police, seeing if the cat's body was thrown away like rubbish. Through all of this searching we were unable to find him. But the next day we received some hopeful news: Burnsville's Animal Control had recently picked up a cat in the area we were searching, and it wasn't Oliver. Perhaps he was still alive!
Five days passed. We knew the odds were slim that he was alive unless he was taken in by a kind stranger. But to make a long story short, Tuesday night my son Elijah was outside and there at the bottom of the driveway was our Prodigal cat, Oliver. He was a bit ragged and he had lost a lot of weight. But he was home, praise God! Our family was so happy to see him, and I don't think Peggy has put him down since his return. Last night it was very cute – Oliver laid next to Peggy's head on her pillow for most of the entire night's sleep. The two are no closer than ever.
Why do I bring this story up? First, I know that you are a cat owner/lover, and you can empathize with the loss of our cat. But I ask that you read the story of the Prodigal son, which Jesus used to describe God's love for those who will return to Him. Please read Luke 15:11-32, and would you then answer the following questions that I borrowed from my Community Bible Study lesson:
- Describe the younger son.
- Considering that the father most likely knows his son's character and lifestyle, why does he honor his son's request to be given his inheritance immediately?
- Why does God allow us this same kind of freedom?
- How does Jesus describe the younger son's change of heart?
- What does Luke 15:20 tell us about the father?
- What does the father's response to his son reveal about God's attitude toward you?
- In a separate Comment, let me know your thoughts about the rest of this post. If you have a lot to say and there are natural breaks, would you mind please breaking up your writing into separate Comments.
Thank you Ed for the examples you provided, for your thoughts and the time it takes for preparing your response. And it would be great if there is anyone else out there to join in with their thoughts and ideas. Thanks and may God bless you with peace and a greater knowledge of God this week.
8 comments:
"...let me instead try to show you that God showed His love through this loss of life. God's Word says that God is love (1 John 4:8). This does not mean that God is just loving in His actions. Instead, God's nature is love. What God does is always loving."
This is the worst case of circular logic ever perpetuated on the human race.
Rule #1) God can do no evil.
Rule #2) If it looks, sounds, and smells like evil, see rule #1.
Killing babies is EVIL... always! Repeat: Killing little babies is EVIL!. One last time: The arbitrary slaughter of babies is, by absolute definition, EVIL.
It cannot be justified. EVER! Any attempt to do so is equivocation at best, or the worst sort of cult-like indoctrination.
Lets get this straight: A certain number of Egyptians enslaved and brutalized the Jews. So instead of giving those EXACT Egyptians a case of hemorrhoids ranging from bothersome to terminal (depending on the level of abuse they engaged in), he LOVINGLY sentences an entire segment of the Egyptian population, who may or may not have ever even SEEN a Jew, to DEATH...
Aside from just stating that God is loving, you completely failed to actually show how this action was loving in any way.
If a schoolyard bully beat up one of your daughters, would going to school and shooting 3 random students show some sort of love? Or ethics?
"And so, am I off my rocker in saying that the taking of Egypt's firstborn lives is a loving action? I don't think I am, but I'll leave that up to you.
YES... that is crazy! That is all kinds of crazy! They make movies about that kind of love. Stephen King writes books about that kind of love. Saying that it was loving BECAUSE GOD DID IT, is completely insane! Would it have more or less ethical if a team of secret Jewish vigilantes had killed the Egyptian babies?
Why do so many Christians seem to think that the crimes of Group A justifies the deaths of Group B as long as it's GOD putting on the smackdown? That's nuts!
If God is really all powerful and all loving, couldn't he come up with a demonstration of power that didn't involve spraying blood across a thousand miles of desert? If this is an example of God's love, then baptism aught not be done with water.
Did individual Egyptians deserve punishments for their crimes? YES. Did some of them deserve death? YES. Did all the evil Egyptians deserve death? NO. Did children and peasants in distant lands who had never SEEN Jews, let alone abused them, ALL deserve to die??? WHAT DO YOU THINK?
You can list all the atrocities done against the Jews until you're blue in the face, but it still cannot justify the cold-blooded MURDER of anyone who wasn't involved. Period.
The Russians, after WWII, killed nearly 90% of the German POWs they had taken by working them to death in labor camps. Was that ethical? Was every one of those soldiers guilty of a capitol crime?
Please... try again, because this kind of scary logic is what get millions killed in wars. THIS is how the followers of Manson and Moon sound...
"God's Justice. I'm not going to forget about the key aspect in the Exodus story of God's Justice and rightful punishment of oppressors."
And if he had stopped there, it would have been justice. But the first time an innocent died it left justice behind and became the temper tantrum of a VERY powerful baby. And yes, I'll call it as I see it... an Evil baby.
"Can you imagine a world where there are no consequences for what they do?"
I see the consequences of being punished for something you didn't do. Let's put God's logic to work with real people and see how it tastes:
Every day you beat up my only child. I ask you to stop, but you refuse. So the next week, when you do it again, I yell at you, then beat Maggie and Olivia with a stick. The next week, you beat up my kid even worse, so I beat Asia to death with a baseball bat. At my trial, I say I did it out of love for my child.
What should happen to me? Should I be set free as guiltless because it was done for love?
By the way... it almost made me physically ill just to type that last bit using real names, especially those names. I feel soiled and ashamed for even being able to think about it using people I love.
It's about 10 minutes later now... I had to walk away for a few minutes because that last allegory upset me that much. I'm fairly certain you're having some fairly angry thoughts right now too... and for that I'm sorry.
But if the idea of even THINKING about such an injustice cause these reactions in us, then what sort of response should God feel for actually having DONE it, and on a grand scale. You can talk about God punishing Egypt for her crimes, but he was really punishing individuals and their families. Thinking about at a national level lets you turn away from the horror of it, but when you see it at a family level, it becomes utterly repugnant and disgusting.
God should have gone to EVERY Egyptian who wrongfully lost their father, mother, son or daughter (who all just happened to be firstborn) and begged their forgiveness, and at the very least, repented of his crimes and at least tried to atone.
But he did not.
Instead, he stonewalled it, and even tried (mostly successfully) to brainwash his followers into thinking it wasn't really one of the biggest mass-murder sprees in history.
Enough for now. Putting all this into words has been far more depressing than I thought it would be, and this isn't the worst of it yet. Even the slaughter of the firstborn was minor compared to the Flood, where ALL of God's faults came together in a Perfect Storm of Injustice. I'll address that one tomorrow...
Give your kids an extra-large hug from me tonight...
~E~
Here is a recent article on the same topic. Thought you might be interested.
Hi Bryan,
Your link did not come through. Would you please re-rost it. Thx
sorry about that
http://albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=3335
Hey Ed, I have heard what you’ve said. Your comments were heard. Here is how I understand what you’ve said, and please correct me if I have misunderstood what you’ve said:
- killing babies is always evil; (Tom’s note – you know too much philosophy to use hyperbole like this. Would you kill one baby to save 1,000 lives? What about 100,000 lives? One million?)
- I completely failed to show how this action (the killing of the Egyptian babies) was loving;
- How do crimes in Group A justify deaths in Group B?;
- How can there be consequence for something you didn’t do?
Again I’ve read what you wrote. I understand what you’ve said.
Let’s start with your analogy . There is nothing in your analogy that works in describing the way that Egypt and Israel dealt with each other:
Ed’s analogy: Every day Tom beats up Ed’s only child. I ask you to stop, but you refuse. So the next week, when you do it again, I yell at you, then beat Maggie and Olivia with a stick. The next week, you beat up my kid even worse, so I beat Asia to death with a baseball bat. At my trial, I say I did it out of love for my child.“
OK, your analogy has the two parties – Ed and his child, and Tom and his three children (Asia, Maggie, and Olivia). They each hurt each other. And Ed kills Tom’s child Asia, and defends his action by saying he killed Asia out of love his child.
You failed to grasp the helpless situation of the Israel slaves in the story of Exodus. Not much of an analogy to the real situation where Egypt who had all of the power over Israel. Egypt had ENSLAVED Israel. Egypt had ordered that all of Israel’s boy infants be killed. And Israel did not do anything in response. Egypt is the slave Master, and Israel was only the slave workers. Egypt continued to work the Israel slaves to death, and when they beg Egypt for mercy, Egypt laughs, takes away a vital part (the straw) of what it takes for their forced labor to make the bricks to make the Egyptian palace and other major building projects. Do you see the major problems now with your analogy?
So let’s add someOne else to your analogy, we’ll call Him YAHWEH. YAHWEH has the power and knowledge to know that if YAHWEH doesn’t step in, Egypt left to itself will work to death all of Israel, all of its children, all of its babies, all of its men and women. All of its’ old and young. And YAHWEH promised a person named Abraham who was the great-great-great-great (and so on) grandfather of Israel that this wouldn’t happen. YAHWEH loves the people of Israel. And YAHWEH has the power to bless Israel. YAHWEH loves the Egyptians buts sees what will happen if the Egyptians continue to grow in power. But YAHWEH hates the way that Egypt is acting.
So how does YAHWEH make Egypt stop their barbaric treatment of Egypt? Don’t we want a God Who is active in the world, Who defends the helpless and punishes the wicked? So YAHWEH sends the first 9 Plagues through His Prophet Moses to ‘Let My People Go’. Here are the plagues:
1. Waters turned to blood Exod. 7:20
2. Frogs Exod. 8:6
3. Lice Exod. 8:17
4. Beetles, flies Exod. 8:24
5. Cattle disease Exod. 9:3
6. Boils Exod. 9:10
7. Hail Exod. 9:24
8. Locusts Exod. 10:13
9. Darkness Exod. 10:22
10. Death of the firstborn Exod. 12:29
(from Wilmington Book of Lists.) And so Ed, you see that YAHWEH tried to find anything that was precious to the Egyptians that would help them to see their sin and guilt, and cause them to release the Jewish slaves. He revealed His power through all of the plagues. YAHWEH hurt their possessions, their wealth (crops and livestock), their health, and even placed them in complete darkness, all without having any effect. And then shortly before His final plague, where He would take the most precious part of their life, their firstborn children, He warned them that there was one last plague to come. He also provided a way of protection from this plague – believing what YAHWEH said (having faith in God’s Word and Promise) and placing the blood of a lamb on the door frame, so that the Angel of Death would “Passover” the protected house. If the Egyptians had any faith in YAHWEH, and followed the instructions of the Passover, then presumably their families would also have been protected. Yet Pharaoh and the Egyptians rejected YAHWEH’s warning and their children paid the price. Sometimes those that are responsible for others like a leader or family head make decisions that have a consequence on their innocent children. This is my response to your points 3 and 4, above. YAHWEH found that the lives of the Egyptian firstborn were worth the millions of Jews, and accomplishing His goal of ultimately sending His Son through the nation of Israel.
Now finally and most importantly, remember that YAHWEH through His protection of Israel is directly accomplishing His most loving goal – sending His Son, the Son of God in order to save the world for the outcome of its (and our) rebellion against Him. Sending Jesus into the world is THE MOST loving action which shows God’s love for the world. John 3:16. And by saving Israel from its slavery and bringing them to the Promised Land was a vital part of accomplishing this goal.
Thank you, Bryan!
The article didn't have any arguements I haven't heard before, but it was a remarkably well-done encapsulation of the reasons why secular humanists stay that way. It also provides a really clear insight into the Christian mind. I have debated pastors who took 10 times as many words trying to say the same thing.
To the humanist like me, however, it remains unconvincing. To my mind, the articles very succinctness and brevity make my own objections that much clearer. Remember my "hurdles" from last year? This article lays bare three of them:
1) "Logic" that isn't. This is in regard to perfection. The article basically says God is Perfect because he says he is. This is circular logic and is inherently faulty. God doesn't get a free pass on this.
2) "Perfection." This is a biggy! Perfection is a unit of measure. As such, it must have a consistent definition, and apply to everything. It is something to measure other things against, and again, as such, stands apart from all those who would measure themselves against it. That would place it above God himself, thus contradicting God's own words.
One of the problems I see consistently in the thought pattern of devout Christians is that they confuse power with perfection. God, as written, is easily the most powerful thing imaginable, period. But what does that get us? Being perfect involves how he uses that power, not just being the biggest kid on the block.
3) Which leads us back to Ethics, the biggest hurdle of them all. In the movie, "Excalibur," King Arthur is trying to explain ethics to his Queen, and says, "My laws must bind all men, high and low, or they are not laws at all."
That is a clear statement of a logical structure. Yet for thousands of years, the followers of the Desert God have had to hedge and waffle, and even invent the art of apologetics, to gloss over all of the horribly unethical actions of their own God.
To say that God is just being true to his nature, and is thus still perfect when he kills innocent babies is to reduce him to the level of an unthinking beast. Why? After all, that is the same arguement used when a puma kills and eats a young child. We say the puma was not being evil, because it was just doing what pumas do all the time.
To make that logical leap, we have to assume that the puma does not have the capacity to view the world through higher emotions like compassion and empathy. To excuse God by saying that is just God's nature does the same thing.
An unethical act is an unethical act, no matter who does it. Some ethics ARE situational. Some unethical acts can be mitigated to a certain degree. But not all of them. If God wants to impress his power and Glory on us, he could use all sorts of other methods besides wholesale slaughter. Loaves and fishes make better demonstrations than drought and famine any day.
My challenge, Bryan, to both you and Tom (and anyone else reading this), is to define why God's actions are excusable. How can he kill children, and indeed whole civilizations, and still be perfect? I know Tom will say that's what he was trying to do in his last post, but when the only arguement is based on bad logic, it needs to be restated...
Thanks again for the link, Bryan! I bookmarked it for future reference...
Pax,
~E~
Hello Again. I purposefully didn't read Tom's last note before responding to Bryan's article. I get too long winded as it is... Mel had an uncle whose doctoral thesis was 22 pages... I wish I had that fine a command of the language... sigh...
Okay... First off, there was no hyperbole in my killing babies is evil rant. Killing babies is always evil. Even if it is mitigated by the resultant circumstances (i.e. saving a million other babies), it is still not a good thing. Sometimes there ARE no good choices, only the lesser of evils.
The reason I judge God so harshly in this respect is that AS GOD, he is never forced into such a stark dilemma. He had more options than just drenching land in Egyptian blood to prevent more spilling of Israeli blood.
Tom, the problem with your apologetics is that you ( and God, apparently) treat Egypt as some sort of collective hive entity, where the sin of one is the sin of all.
Egypt is not the Borg.
Let's look at some of what you said:
"Egypt had ENSLAVED Israel. Egypt had ordered that all of Israel’s boy infants be killed. And Israel did not do anything in response. Egypt is the slave Master, and Israel was only the slave workers. Egypt continued to work the Israel slaves to death, and when they beg Egypt for mercy, Egypt laughs, takes away a vital part (the straw) of what it takes for their forced labor to make the bricks to make the Egyptian palace and other major building projects. Do you see the major problems now with your analogy?"
Do you see the problem with YOUR arguement? Egypt was not a person, and neither was Israel. They were both made up of millions of individuals. SOME Egyptians enslaved, humiliated, abused, raped and killed ALL Israelites. But God punished ALL Egyptians for the crimes of only SOME. How is this fair?????
"Egypt" is not and was not a singular being. How can I get this idea through?
Did ALL Germans hate Jews?
Did ALL Iraqis hate Kurds?
Did ALL Chinese hate intellectuals?
Did ALL Rwandans hate the Hutu?
Did ALL Southerners believe in slavery?
Were ALL Swedes, Norwegians and Danes bloodthirsty Vikings?
"Don’t we want a God Who is active in the world, Who defends the helpless and punishes the wicked?"
Yes, yes, YES!!! Yes we do! And if I ever FIND one, I'll bow my head in thanks. YOUR God doesn't qualify. He didn't punish just the wicked... HE PUNISHED EVERYONE IN EGYPT! And he still uses the same tactics today.
Most the Israelites were in the far north of Egypt, but the nation of Egypt stretches for over 1000 miles up the Nile. MOST Egyptians did not own slaves, and NONE had the power to free them except Pharaoh. ALL Egyptian families suffered for Pharaoh's crimes. Even families who derived NO benefit from the enslavement of the Israelites, and NEVER committed a crime against them suffered the same fate.
The Egyptians who were truly responsible for the crimes were the wealthy (or those protected by the wealthy) and suffered very little from the first nine plagues, kind of like how our sanctions against Iraq didn't really affect Saddam and his chosen, but did cause widespread suffering in the general population.
God should have had more options than an American President. GOD should be able to selectively punish the ones committing the crimes. GOD should be able to demonstrate his power without wholesale slaughter.
But no, God doesn't work that way. Instead, he sends plagues that kill indiscriminately and are vague enough in origin that most of the population can't even be sure they are from God... Any number of recent cable documentaries have shown how perfectly natural causes could have brought about a chain of events similar to the 10 plagues. Even today, there is doubt that God really did it.
What good is a massive display of power when the people you want to impress can't even be sure you did it? What good is a massive display that doesn't actually impress the one it's designed for?
Why not a 600 mile-tall Heavenly Father looming over Egypt bellowing "Let my people go!" ???
Why not a 600 ft. tall God on a giant pogo stick that only smooshed the really evil ones?
No. God chose a slow, nasty torture for the entire Egyptian nation instead.
God went into Stephen King/Quentin Tarentino mode instead.
"Sending Jesus into the world is THE MOST loving action which shows God’s love for the world. John 3:16. And by saving Israel from its slavery and bringing them to the Promised Land was a vital part of accomplishing this goal."
It was, eh? Is that why God told Joshua to loving annihilate every civilization that already lived in the Promised Land"??? To make room for Jesus?
Depopulating an entire region is awfully odd way of showing love. Every man, woman, and child was killed for the "crime" of living in Canaan. Wow... That's not love, that's genocide. Whether it's based on severe mental problems, or outright Evil, it still kinda disqualifies your God from any claim of being all-loving.
Tom, your God has some redeeming qualities, but the refusal of Christians to see that he also has a dark, even evil, aspect to his personality is VERY alarming to us non-believers. It smacks of all the same things that Christians object to in demagogue cults. It is why we fight so hard to keep your religion out of our laws and schools. And it never changes, never bends, never listens to reason.
Maybe if God led by example, and admitted his flaws, and tried to do something about them, he might prove to be a being worthy of adoration and worship. As he is, all the emotions he invokes are negative.
Pax,
~E~
(Pulling pin on a fresh grenade)
(one, two, five!)(three, sire)(Three!)
And one of these days, let's deal with the whole John 3:16 thing, because it's just not nearly as impressive as you believers seem to think it is... John McCain suffered worse, and I wouldn't even vote for him, let alone worship him...
Post a Comment